
via University of Cambridge
Scientists have produced a map showing where the world’s major food crops should be grown to maximise yield and minimise environmental impact. This would capture large amounts of carbon, increase biodiversity, and cut agricultural use of freshwater to zero.
If we moved production to better suited areas, we would see environmental benefits very quickly
Robert Beyer
The reimagined world map of agriculture includes large new farming areas for many major crops around the cornbelt in the mid-western US, and below the Sahara desert. Huge areas of farmland in Europe and India would be restored to natural habitat.
The redesign – assuming high-input, mechanized farming – would cut the carbon impact of global croplands by 71%, by allowing land to revert to its natural, forested state. This is the equivalent of capturing twenty years’ worth of our current net CO2 emissions. Trees capture carbon as they grow, and also enable more carbon to be captured by the soil than when crops are grown in it.
In this optimized scenario, the impact of crop production on the world’s biodiversity would be reduced by 87%. This would drastically reduce the extinction risk for many species, for which agriculture is a major threat. The researchers say that croplands would quickly revert back to their natural state, often recovering their original carbon stocks and biodiversity within a few decades.
The redesign would eliminate the need for irrigation altogether, by growing crops in places where rainfall provides all the water they need to grow. Agriculture is currently responsible for around 70% of global freshwater use, and this causes drinking water shortages in many drier parts of the world.
The researchers used global maps of the current growing areas of 25 major crops, including wheat, barley and soybean, which together account for over three quarters of croplands worldwide. They developed a mathematical model to look at all possible ways to distribute this cropland across the globe, while maintaining overall production levels for each crop. This allowed them to identify the option with the lowest environmental impact.
The study is published today in the journal Nature Communications Earth & Environment.
“In many places, cropland has replaced natural habitat that contained a lot of carbon and biodiversity – and crops don’t even grow very well there. If we let these places regenerate, and moved production to better suited areas, we would see environmental benefits very quickly,” said Dr Robert Beyer, formerly a researcher in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Zoology, and first author of the study. Beyer is now based at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Germany.
Previous studies have identified priority areas for ecological restoration, but this is the first to plot the relocation of agricultural land to maximise long-term environmental benefits without compromising food security.
While a complete global relocation of cropland is clearly not a scenario that could currently be put into practice, the scientists say their models highlight places were croplands are currently very unproductive, but have potential to be hotspots for biodiversity and carbon storage.
Taking a pared-back approach and only redistributing croplands within national borders, rather than globally, would still result in significant benefits: global carbon impact would be reduced by 59% and biodiversity impact would be 77% lower than at present.
A third, even more realistic option of only relocating the worst-offending 25% of croplands nationally would result in half of the benefits of optimally moving all croplands.
“It’s currently not realistic to implement this whole redesign. But even if we only relocated a fraction of the world’s cropland, focusing on the places that are least efficient for growing crops, the environmental benefits would be tremendous,” said Beyer.
The study finds that the optimal distribution of croplands will change very little until the end of the century, irrespective of the specific ways in which the climate may change.
“Optimal cropping locations are no moving target. Areas where environmental footprints would be low, and crop yields high, for the current climate will largely remain optimal in the future,” said Professor Andrea Manica in the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge, senior author of the paper.
The researchers acknowledge that relocating cropland must be done in a way that is acceptable to the people it affects, both economically and socially. They cite examples of set-aside schemes that give farmers financial incentives to retire part of their land for environmental benefit. Financial incentives can also encourage people to farm in better suited locations.
The model generated alternative global distribution maps depending on the way the land is farmed – ranging from advanced, fully mechanised production with high-yielding crop varieties and optimum fertiliser and pesticide application, through to traditional subsistence-based organic farming. Even redistribution of less intensive farming practices to optimal locations would substantially reduce their carbon and biodiversity impacts.
While other studies show that if we moved towards more plant-based diets we could significantly reduce the environmental impacts of agriculture, the researchers say that in reality diets aren’t changing quickly. Their model assumed that diets will not change, and focused on producing the same food as today but in an optimal way.
Many of the world’s croplands are located in areas where they have a huge environmental footprint, having replaced carbon-rich and biodiversity-rich ecosystems, and are a significant drain on local water resources. These locations were chosen for historical reasons, such as their proximity to human settlements, but the researchers say it is now time to grow food in a more optimal way.
Original Article: Relocating farmland could turn back clock twenty years on carbon emissions
More from: University of Cambridge | Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
The Latest on: Relocating farmland
- It’s time to put abortion clinics on federal landon July 1, 2022 at 9:32 am
Doing so would be a bold move fraught with potential legal challenges. It may also be the best shot we have to help pregnant women and girls who need to terminate pregnancies.
- Gov't issues land titles in St Catherineon July 1, 2022 at 9:28 am
Over 120 residents in St Catherine are now land owners after a team, led by Prime Minister Andrew Holness, issued the tittles recently at the Old Harbour New Testament Church of ...
- Move over Splash Mountain. Disney's 'Princess and the Frog'-themed Tiana's Bayou Adventure is coming 2024.on July 1, 2022 at 9:00 am
Splash Mountain's overhaul will be complete in 2024. Its current theme is tied to "Song of the South," a Jim Crow-era film, which has been criticized for racist tropes. The new "P ...
- Chris Broussard slams Kevin Durant over trade request: ‘The move of a follower’on July 1, 2022 at 8:55 am
Durant reportedly prefers to land in either Miami or Phoenix – both title-ready contenders – but the Nets will be looking to receive the best trade package they can. Durant was putting up MVP-caliber ...
- Raptors land free agent Otto Porter Jr.: reporton July 1, 2022 at 8:53 am
Porter is an eight-year NBA veteran and the prototypical Raptors player: a versatile 6-foot-8 wing who has a wingspan of greater than seven feet.
- Shinde's maiden policy move on Metro car-shed kicks up a rowon July 1, 2022 at 8:31 am
The first policy initiative of new Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to revive the contentious Mumbai Metro car-shed in the eco-sensitive ...
- USC, UCLA and the Big Ten: How and Why College Sports’ Latest Stunning Move Happenedon July 1, 2022 at 7:55 am
High above the field that day within the Ohio State press box, Kliavkoff and Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren strode side by side through the hallways—seemingly fast friends, business partners and ...
- Chinese purchase of North Dakota farmland raises national security concerns in Washingtonon July 1, 2022 at 6:55 am
The purchase of 300 acres of bucolic farmland in North Dakota is raising national security concerns over the buyer: Chinese food ingredient maker Fufeng Group.
- Man City to land £1m bonus despite CJ Egan-Riley’s free transfer move to Burnley with sizeable development feeon July 1, 2022 at 6:13 am
MANCHESTER CITY hope they can get up to £1million from teen full-back CJ Egan-Riley’s move to Burnley. The 19-year-old is out of contract at the Etihad but the Prem champions are still entitled to ...
- Latest Migrant Tragedy in Texas Highlights Crisis Along Deadliest Migration Land Routeon July 1, 2022 at 3:00 am
More than 1,238 lives have been lost during migration in the Americas in 2021, among them at least 51 children, according to new data published by the International Organization for Migration´s (IOM) ...
via Bing News
The Latest on: Relocating farmland
via Google News
Add Comment