Moving safely: tight-fitting FFP2 and KN95 masks drastically reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection, even during prolonged encounters at close range, as is inevitable on public transport. They protect particularly well when both the infected and non-infected person wear their masks properly.
A detailed study shows the maximum risks of being infected by the coronavirus for different scenarios with and without masks
Three metres are not enough to ensure protection. Even at that distance, it takes less than five minutes for an unvaccinated person standing in the breath of a person with Covid-19 to become infected with almost 100 percent certainty. That’s the bad news. The good news is that if both are wearing well-fitting medical or, even better, FFP2 masks, the risk drops dramatically. In a comprehensive study, a team from the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organisation in Göttingen has investigated to what extent masks protect under which wearing conditions. In the process, the researchers determined the maximum risk of infection for numerous situations and considered several factors that have not been included in similar studies to date.
The Göttingen team was surprised at how great the risk of infection with the coronavirus is. “We would not have thought that at a distance of several metres it would take so little time for the infectious dose to be absorbed from the breath of a virus carrier,” says Eberhard Bodenschatz, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organisation. At this distance, the breathing air has already spread in a cone shape in the air; the infectious particles are correspondingly diluted. In addition, the particularly large and thus virus-rich particles fall to the ground after only a short distance through the air. “In our study we found that the risk of infection without wearing masks is enormously high after only a few minutes, even at a distance of three metres, if the infected persons have the high viral load of the delta variant of the Sars-CoV-2 virus,” says Eberhard Bodenschatz. And such encounters are unavoidable in schools, restaurants, clubs or even outdoors.
Well-fitting FFP2 masks reduce the risk at least into the per thousand range.
As high as the risk of infection is without mouth-nose protection, medical or FFP2 masks protect effectively. The Göttingen study confirms that FFP2 or KN95 masks are particularly effective in filtering infectious particles from the air breathed – especially if they are as tightly sealed as possible at the face. If both the infected and the non-infected person wear well-fitting FFP2 masks, the maximum risk of infection after 20 minutes is hardly more than one per thousand, even at the shortest distance. If their masks fit poorly, the probability of infection increases to about four percent. If both wear well-fitting medical masks, the virus is likely to be transmitted within 20 minutes with a maximum probability of ten percent. The study also confirms the intuitive assumption that for effective protection against infection, in particular the infected person should wear a mask that filters as well as possible and fits tightly to the face.
The infection probabilities determined by the Max Planck team indicate the upper limit of the risk in each case. “In daily life, the actual probability of infection is certainly 10 to 100 times smaller,” says Eberhard Bodenschatz. This is because the air that flows out of the mask at the edges is diluted, so you don’t get all the unfiltered breathing air. But we assumed this because we can’t measure for all situations how much breathing air from one mask wearer reaches another person, and because we wanted to calculate the risk as conservatively as possible,” Bodenschatz explains. “Under these conditions, if even the largest theoretical risk is small, then you’re on the very safe side under real conditions.” For the comparative value without the protection of a mask, however, the safety buffer turns out to be much smaller. “For such a situation, we can determine the viral dose inhaled by an unprotected person with fewer assumptions,” says Gholamhossein Bagheri, who as a research group leader at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization who is the lead author of the current study.
“Masks in schools are a very good idea”
In their calculations of the risk of infection, the Göttingen team considered a number of factors that had not previously been included in comparable studies. For example, the researchers investigated how a poor fit of the mask weakens the protection and how this can be prevented. “The materials of FFP2 or KN95 masks, but also of some medical masks, filter extremely effectively,” says Gholamhossein Bagheri. “The risk of infection is then dominated by the air coming out and going in at the edges of the mask.” This happens when the edge of the mask is not close to the face. In elaborate experiments, Bagheri, Bodenschatz and their team measured the size and amount of respiratory particles that flow past the edges of masks that fit differently. “A mask can be excellently adapted to the shape of the face if you bend its metal strap into a rounded W before putting it on,” says Eberhard Bodenschatz. “Then the infectious aerosol particles no longer get past the mask, and glasses no longer fog up either.”
How masks protect against Covid-19
Using a manikin, a team from the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organisation demonstrates how the respiratory cloud, and possibly coronaviruses with it, spread in different scenarios. Without a mask, many potentially infectious particles disperse in the room. Surgical masks already reduce the amount significantly, even if they fit poorly. Tight-fitting FFP2 or KN95 masks protect particularly well.
The team also considered that droplets that people spread when they breathe or speak dry while in the air and become lighter. This means that they remain in the air longer but also have an increased virus concentration as equal size droplets directly after release. When inhaled, the opposite happens: the particles take up water again, grow like a drop in the cloud and therefore deposit more easily in the respiratory tract.
Although the detailed analysis by the Max Planck researchers in Göttingen shows that tight-fitting FFP2 masks provide 75 times better protection compared to well-fitting surgical masks and that the way a mask is worn makes a huge difference; even medical masks significantly reduce the risk of infection compared to a situation without any mouth-nose protection at all. “That’s why it’s so important for people to wear a mask during the pandemic,” says Gholamhossein Bagheri. And Eberhard Bodenschatz adds, “Our results show once again that mask-wearing in schools and also in general is a very good idea.”
Original Article: How well masks protect
More from: Max Planck Society
The Latest on: FFP2 masks
- How useful are Germany’s Covid restrictions?on July 1, 2022 at 8:02 am
Protective measures such as wearing a mask correctly and lockdowns can be effective in the fight against Covid, an expert commission in Germany has found. But many questions remain unanswered.
- COVID: How useful are restrictions as infection numbers soar?on July 1, 2022 at 6:11 am
Restrictions imposed quickly to combat the COVID pandemic have a measurable effect, according to an expert commission. The assessment comes at a time when infection numbers again threaten to spiral ...
- Italy lifts mask mandate for private sector workerson July 1, 2022 at 5:41 am
Masks will no longer be required in the workplace but Italian companies will have the right to impose restrictions for employees deemed ...
- Coronavirus and summer travel: how to stay safe on holidayon July 1, 2022 at 5:11 am
With infection rates rising again in the UK, should you test before you fly – and do you need a mask?
- Travel abroad: Covid rules in popular Swiss holiday destinations explainedon July 1, 2022 at 3:15 am
When it comes to Covid regulations in Switzerland and elsewhere in Europe, the situation is certainly much more relaxed than it was last summer. However, certain countries still maintain rules in ...
- The destinations that have scrapped all travel restrictions – regardless of vaccination statuson June 30, 2022 at 3:46 am
Mauritius announced that it would drop all remaining Covid travel restrictions from 1 July, becoming one of a handful of long-haul destinations to do away with its lingering traces of travel admin ...
- Philippines will continue mandatory maskson June 27, 2022 at 3:34 am
The Advisory Council of Experts (ACE) comprising some of the Philippines foremost authorities on public health, economics, and analytics met on 24 June and decided the Philippines would continue ...
- Corona rules now apply in Bavariaon June 25, 2022 at 10:49 am
In Bavaria, there are very few Corona regulations left - and even those have been relaxed yet another time: Since Saturday, May 28, you no longer have to wear an FFP2 mask in health care facilities ...
- ‘Denied boarding by easyJet for not having the correct type of facemask’on June 24, 2022 at 4:04 pm
They arrived in plenty of time but didn’t get any further than the bag drop. EasyJet staff refused to check in their case because they didn’t have the correct FFP2 mask to board the flight. They were ...
- Italy removes mask mandate for flightson June 24, 2022 at 11:28 am
The UK foreign office has updated its advice for travel to Italy, after the country removed its mask mandate for flights.
via Bing News
The Latest on: KN95 masks
via Google News