via University of Kent
Researchers from Kent’s School of Biosciences and the Francis Crick Institute have used gene editing technology to create female-only and male-only mice litters with 100% efficiency.
This proof of principle study, published in Nature Communications, demonstrates how the technology could be used to improve animal welfare in scientific research and perhaps also agriculture.
In scientific research and also farming, there is often a need for either male or female animals. For example, laboratory research into male or female reproduction requires only animals of the sex being studied. And in farming, only female animals are required for egg production and in dairy herds. This means it is common practice for animals of the unrequired sex to be culled after birth.
The researchers’ new method uses a two-part genetic system to inactivate embryos shortly after fertilisation, allowing only the desired sex to develop. Such a genetically-based method to control the sex of offspring could drastically reduce culling in both industries.
The embryo selection is based on the fact that there are two elements of CRISPR-Cas9 – the Cas9 enzyme that cuts the DNA, allowing scientists to alter specific regions, and the guide RNA which carries the Cas9 to the right location on the genome. The team placed one element of the system on the father’s X or Y chromosome, meaning that it will only be inherited by female or male embryos respectively. The other element is contributed by the mother, and is inherited by all embryos.
They targeted the Top1 gene, which is essential to DNA replication and repair. When an embryo formed from a sperm and egg, each containing one half of CRISPR-Cas9, the gene-editing was triggered in the embryo and it was not able to develop beyond a very early stage of around 16 to 32 cells.
Using this method, the researchers were able to control, with 100% effect, the sex of a litter. To produce a male-only litter, the researchers edited the father’s X chromosome, meaning only females inherited the deleterious mutation, and for a female-only litter, they edited the Y chromosome.
Surprisingly, the method did not lead to a 50% decrease in the number of offspring produced, rather the litter sizes were between 61% – 72% of the control litters. The researchers suggest this is because animals such as mice produce more eggs than required during each ovarian cycle, allowing for a proportion of them to be lost during early development without reducing litter size. This means that in situations where one sex is needed, fewer breeding animals will be required in order to produce the same number of the desired sex of offspring.
As the Top1 gene is well conserved across mammals, these results may also be applicable to other animals.
Charlotte Douglas, first author and former PhD student and postdoctoral scientist at the Crick, says: “This method works as we split the genome editing process in half, between a male and female, and it is only when the two halves meet in an embryo through breeding, that it is activated. Embryos with both halves cannot develop beyond very early cell stages.
“We’ve also shown this process works successfully in different combinations – introducing either the Cas9 or the guide RNA elements on to the mother’s or father’s chromosomes.”
As the offspring which survive only contain half of the CRISPR-Cas9 elements within their genome, this acts as a control preventing the sex-selection being passed down to further generations, unless they are selectively bred with an individual of the opposite sex containing the other half. This is different to genetic engineering through ‘gene-drive’ methods, which seek to spread a genetic mutation widely amongst a population.
There are also no harmful effects of the gene edit in the surviving offspring.
James Turner, author and group leader of the Sex Chromosome Biology Laboratory at the Crick says: ‘This work could have immediate and valuable impact in scientific laboratories, as we’ve shown how it is safe and effective in mice, a common mammal used in medical and scientific research. While a lot of research needs both sexes, there are areas of study where only one is needed. For example, when studying the reproductive system, sex-specific diseases, or certain hormones.
Peter Ellis, author and senior lecturer in molecular genetics and reproduction at Kent, says: ‘The implications of this work are potentially far-reaching when it comes to improving animal welfare, but should be considered at ethical and regulatory levels.
‘In particular, before any potential use in agriculture, there would need to be extensive public conversation and debate, as well as changes to legislation. On the scientific side, there is also much work to be done over a number of years. Further research is needed, first to develop the particular gene editing toolkits for different species, and then to check they are safe and effective.’
Original Article: Researchers use gene-editing to create single sex mice litters
The Latest on: Gene editing for animal welfare
- Is it ethical to use animals as organ farms for humans?on January 22, 2022 at 1:51 pm
The theory of animal-to-human transplants, known as xenotransplantation, dates back hundreds of years. Only recently, though, has that goal appeared to be within reach. Advances in gene-editing ...
- Gene-edited food is 5 years away in England, says government scientiston January 21, 2022 at 9:01 am
The UK parliament passed a law to help researchers do trials of gene-edited crops in England, and the chief scientist at the UK's Department for , Food and Rural Affairs says it would take at least fi ...
- China's cloning of genetically modified dogs for research raises concernson January 4, 2022 at 9:17 am
The beagle puppy named Longlong, born in May, is a clone of a gene-edited beagle called Apple ... But the work has been condemned as cruel by animal welfare groups operating in China.
- Scientists Used CRISPR Gene Editing to Choose the Sex of Mouse Pupson December 21, 2021 at 9:55 am
It’s not a perfect solution. The gene edit is powerful—maybe too much so. With farm animals, the goal isn’t to eradicate a species, but rather to bias the sex of the animal towards one side and ...
- Animal Learning and Intelligence Newson December 19, 2021 at 4:00 pm
5, 2021 — The smarter the bird, the more unique welfare needs it has in captivity ... Both Early Experiences and Gene Expression Influence Impulsivity in Chicks Aug. 18, 2021 — Differences ...
- Gene editing tech should not be used to continue low-welfare farming – reporton November 30, 2021 at 4:07 pm
Animal welfare must be a priority ... “We are taking a step-by-step approach to enable gene editing, starting with plants only and then reviewing the application to animals and microorganisms ...
- Biotech 'free for all' won’t help UK farmerson October 3, 2021 at 5:18 pm
Read more: Greenlight given for gene editing exploration “Sweeping away regulations ... We must increase soil carbon, wildlife and animal welfare on farms to solve the climate and nature crises, and ...
- Brexit not the only B word causing political frictionon September 29, 2021 at 12:36 pm
Few have an issue with gene editing when it comes to treating cancer ... and aren’t weighed down with environmental and animal welfare controls – not to mention the looming prospect of ...
- Plant-based meatson January 29, 2021 at 4:19 am
Now, we have the advent of not just one but two major developments in the food industry: a generational shift in consumer diets, as increasingly meat alternatives build traction across a background of ...
- Gene Editingon August 6, 2020 at 4:06 am
Gene editing is an important tool that can unlock tremendous ... allowing farmers to reduce pesticide use and conserve water. For animal welfare … by eliminating the threat of diseases like PRRS (a ...
via Bing News
The Latest on: Gene editing for animal welfare
via Google News